In other words, stop worrying and love the bomb. Yes, I’m quoting Dr. Strangelove for reason (if you haven’t seen it, drop everything and watch it. And thank me later).
We are living in the golden age of the internet though, but perhaps not for long. Granted, the overall amount of freedom we’ve had has changed in the past decade or so – punk 90s kids stand up! – but it is definitely still there. But it might not be for much longer. All of the things that people fear about the web seem to be manifesting themselves in the media and causing new calls for future restrictions that aren’t actually beneficial.
Appreciate it while it lasts – and fight to make sure it stays that way. It just takes a few people to care and amplify their voice in order to make a difference. And today’s web has resulted in a remarkable worldwide freedom of speech
Plenty of people more knowledgeable than me have written about net neutrality, freedom of information, and every other topic related to that. But it is important – nay, essential – to add another voice to the conversation.
Keep in mind that an open internet is about a lot more than you – so post about it, share your opinions, and most importantly, join the conversation.
You have more to lose than you even realize. Freedom of information is about a lot than your ability to download music or movies (cause c’mon we all know that there will be new ways to do that even though torrents and other sources get shut down every day – new ones are always gonna pop up).
But not everyone has access to that kind of technology, or if they do they don’t know how to take advantage of it.
And this is about more than just access to various websites, streaming music or TV shows – it is about the ability to access valuable information that could change yours or someone else’s life.
That’s why it is so important.
May 9, 2008
Global Voices Online has been one of my favorite sites for a while now. It is a nonprofit project that “seeks to aggregate, curate, and amplify the global conversation online – shining light on places and people other media often ignore. We work to develop tools, institutions and relationships that will help all voices, everywhere, to be heard.”
They translate and share posts written by wonderful bloggers from all the world – it is one of the most remarkable examples of citizen journalism on the web, in my opinion. The founders also started Global Voices Advocacy (which promotes free speech and defends bloggers from censorship) and Rising Voices (an outreach program that provides knowledge and resources to activists and citizen journalists in under-represented communities).
The purpose of this love-fest is to point out the upcoming GlobalVoices Summit being held in Budapest at the end of June. Now, I can only wish I was actually attending, but I’m sure it will be an amazing event – and that there will be lots of fantastic commentary on the conference blog. Here’s a quote from the site:
“The Global Voices Citizen Media Summit 2008 will explore topics around the theme “Citizen Media and Citizenhood”, and address fundamental issues surrounding the actual and potential role of citizen media producers in the public life of the countries they live in. As the Internet and the increasing accessibility of citizen media tools offer growing numbers of people throughout the world the means to distribute information globally, how does this affect or change the ways in which people participate in public life? Can citizen media make people better citizens? How can citizen media help affect lasting social change?”
Personally, I believe that citizen media and blogging is incredibly important; after all, even the most intrepid reporter can’t cover everything, and besides, there is something very powerful about an individual or group telling their own story.
March 4, 2008
Performancing has a great interview with Larry W. Philips, who edited the book Ernest Hemingway on Writing. As you might guess, the book is full of the Papa’s observations on the nature of the writer’s life; however, the author makes some interesting points about writing, journalism, and blogging in the interview. When asked about fledgling writers getting started with newspaper work (after all, that is how Hemingway began), he replied:
“I think numerous dangers lurk in journalism for the writer who wants to go beyond journalism. Bloggers are actually closer to having the kind of freedom to really develop as writers, IMO, than journalists. I’ll give an exaggerated answer here, in order to show what I mean.
A journalist has limitations. He can’t use slang, he can’t use the way real people talk (often), he can’t (or isn’t supposed to) include his opinion, can’t mention personal beliefs or convictions, isn’t supposed to draw conclusions, can’t use obscenity, can’t use long, odd or quirky sentences, can’t say anything bad about a company or product (you may get sued), can’t make the story too long, and on and on—I could list many other limitations. It’s rather like a painter being told to go paint a picture, but without using yellow, blue, red, green, brown, black, or purple. This is an exaggeration, as I say, but it hints at what the problem is, and what Hemingway was getting at.”
On a related note, I recently had a client say how pleased she is when writers/prospective writers have blogs, because then she can see the raw material and how they really write, without the luxury of an editor(s). This is true – while blogs might be more likely than say, a magazine or book to contain typos (it happens to the best of us), it is also a lot more difficult to hide. Like I’ve said before, if you want to be a writer, perhaps the first thing you should do is get a blog and get started.
October 29, 2007
One of the things that is so great about blogging is that your audience can participate and leave thought-provoking comments, like this one from Maryam (check out her blog – I hate to use cliches, but the classic “it’s a feast for the senses” truly applies here) left on this post: “Journalists I know who are not bloggers are concerned that so much of the blog world is so unchecked, unsubstantiated, and yet so influential…They feel it is out of control. What do you think?”
There seems to be a divide between the bloggers and the non-bloggers on this issue. The bloggers think that the blogosphere (and in most cases, the web in general) is awesome and wonderful and everyone should participate, while non-bloggers seem to focus on the more negative aspects of blogging. Personally, I tend to take both sides with a grain of salt, although clearly I fall on the pro-web side.
In fact, that grain of salt is necessary when reading blogs as well – while posts on say, the New York Times’s array of blogs can be considered fairly credible, as well as the posts on plenty of independent blogs (just because someone doesn’t work for a major media outlet doesn’t mean they are necessarily incorrect or dishonest, after all), it is essential to realize that many bloggers or people who post/comment/write things on the web aren’t accountable to anyone, particularly if they’re anonymous.
Is it getting out of control? I’m not sure that’s the case – one of the best things about the blogosphere, in my opinion, is that anyone can participate and share their version of the truth, and out of all the stories, we can all form our own opinions and views. Of course, gossip does tend to run rampant, but it’s not like bloggers invented sensationalism – the web just lets the juicy stories move faster and reach a bigger audience. However, it seems that there is always someone ready to report their side of things of as well – the web is kind of self-regulating like that, even if some bloggers are prone to taking a story and running with it.
I think that part of the problem is the rest of media’s perception of bloggers is the simple fact that the blogosphere encompasses everything from major sites like Daily Kos and the Huffington Postto personal diaries – and for every blogger who posts gossip and speculation (which isn’t something I take issue with as long it’s not presented as facts) or cat pictures, there is someone who’s acting like a journalist and reporting the news from their perspective, like all the brave souls blogging from inside Burma or the people who are first on the scene after a important event or a natural disaster occurs – the ones go places or see things that journalists can’t.
However, it is sometimes difficult to determine whether a blog or website is credible, which is indeed a problem. It’s not like it’s even remotely possible to issue blogging licenses or regulate the internet – at all. And isn’t one of the best things about the web is that it’s a completely democratic platform; anyone can publish whatever they want (and for those of you who are going to get all Andrew Keenian here – if you don’t like something, you really don’t have to read/watch/listen to it).
When it comes to determining the credibility of something on the web, we have to listen to our own instincts (although personally, I tend to immediately discount sites or blogs that are full of spelling and grammatical errors – a few typos are human, but if someone lacks a basic grasp of the language, I don’t listen to them. A little bitchy, I know, but considering the glut of content on the web and the ease with which anyone can post, taking the time to write and edit something coherent is essential to getting your voice heard).
To that end, is being a blogger really so different from being a columnist? You’re writing about things from your own perspective, in your own voice, and sharing your opinions on a regular basis. Some bloggers just have more widely columns than others, the same as traditional journalists.
Of course, feel free to take my opinions with a grain of salt. I’m a blogger, after all.